Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from May, 2005

On Fairness

Quizzes are unfair competitions. In a running race, for example, all the athletes run on the same track, and the fastest among them wins. In golf, all the competitors play on the same course under the same conditions, and the most skilled of them wins. In a quiz, however, each team of finalists is asked a different question each time that other teams may or may not get to answer. Hence, many factors such as the seating of teams, the passing format, bias in question setting, etc skew the outcome in a way that may not reflect the ability of the teams. Okay, so all of that is old news. Today, stuff like Infinite Rebounds as a passing format and drawing lots for seating are pretty standard in quizzes. However, this is not enough. More is needed. Althought the combination of IR and drawing lots has made quizzes more fair than before, it is felt that we should go further to ensure fairness. So the questions is, what more can be done? The Centaurian System The Centaurian System is a pa...
Round Reversals - Are they really that effective? I was reading JR 's anniversary article archives written in a seemingly alternately illegible hand and experienced firsthand Gaurav 's pole-position & 4 quarter system at the S.E.Q. This post is a result of these two things. The point is this, whatever may be the fallacies in a particular system of scoring these are ironed out due to round reversal. I.e. if a certain team is getting large number of directs due to another team sitting before them, this advantage is immediately transferred to the team on the otherside of that team. So seemingly all is well. Then comes Quiz-O-mania '05, which witnessed super Vibhendu-Anand first half performance followed by an amazing catch-up in the second half by The Moops. (ala CSKA Moscow ). Reason? It was surmised that the first half of questions had a concentration of Hindi-film questions and due to these questions being absent and/or due to round reversal Gaurav's team getting...
The Pune Season Ender Quiz 2004-05 14th May 2005 Results: 1st: Niranjan Pednekar (TRDDC) & Sudarshan Purohit (PSPL) 2nd: Amit Varma and Leslie (Wisden Cricifo) 3rd: Rachit Lahoti (GSSL) and Abhinav Sharma (IIM Lucknow) Joint 4th : Aditya Udas (MESCOE) & Meghashyam Shirodkar, Ganesh Hegde (VIT) & Shivaji Marella (BJMC) 6th: Vivek Venkataramani (BJMC) and Abhishek Nagaraj (COEP) Organised by: Gaurav Sabnis, J. Ramanand & B.V. Harish Kumar QM: Gaurav Sabnis Report: The Season Ender Quiz (thats the official name) had all what everyone desires in a perfect quiz. The elims had fine audio questions spanning a variety of music genre. The finals were formatted as a basketball game with 4 quarters with a round reversal after each (with no change in positions). The scoring was 2 points for a correct answer and 1 for half, doing away with the usual multiple of 10s scoring pattern. This made the final scores rather close: 20 for the 1st upto 9 for the 6th. A new 'p...
Defending quizzing Samrat's quizzing partner at IIM-L, Tadatmya Vaishnav , has written a couple of posts on the usual arguments against quizzers & quizzing. Here they are: * In defence of quizzing - I * In defence of quizzing - II